Skip Navigation



Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published online on July 9, 2007

Cerebral Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm110
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/4/740    most recent
bhm110v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Canessa, N.
Right arrow Articles by Shallice, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Canessa, N.
Right arrow Articles by Shallice, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The Different Neural Correlates of Action and Functional Knowledge in Semantic Memory: An fMRI Study

Nicola Canessa1,2,3, Francesca Borgo4, Stefano F. Cappa1,2,5, Daniela Perani2,5, Andrea Falini5, Giovanni Buccino3, Marco Tettamanti2,5 and Tim Shallice4,6

1 CRESA, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20031, Milan, Italy, 2 Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132, Milan, Italy, 3 Neurosciences Department, University of Parma, 43100, Parma, Italy, 4 Cognitive Neuroscience Sector, SISSA, 34014, Trieste, Italy, 5 CERMAC, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132, Milan, Italy, 6 Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College, London, WC1E 6BT, UK

Address correspondence to Stefano F. Cappa, CERMAC, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, DIBIT, via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy. Email: cappa.stefano{at}hsr.it.

Previous reports suggest that the internal organization of semantic memory is in terms of different "types of knowledge," including "sensory" (information about perceptual features), "action" (motor-based knowledge of object utilization), and "functional" (abstract properties, as function and context of use). Consistent with this view, a specific loss of action knowledge, with preserved functional knowledge, has been recently observed in patients with left frontoparietal lesions. The opposite pattern (impaired functional knowledge with preserved action knowledge) was reported in association with anterior inferotemporal lesions. In the present study, the cerebral representation of action and functional knowledge was investigated using event-related analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data. Fifteen subjects were presented with pictures showing pairs of manipulable objects and asked whether the objects within each pair were used with the same manipulation pattern ("action knowledge" condition) or in the same context ("functional knowledge" condition). Direct comparisons showed action knowledge, relative to functional knowledge, to activate a left frontoparietal network, comprising the intraparietal sulcus, the inferior parietal lobule, and the dorsal premotor cortex. The reverse comparison yielded activations in the retrosplenial and the lateral anterior inferotemporal cortex. These results confirm and extend previous neuropsychological data and support the hypothesis of the existence of different types of information processing in the internal organization of semantic memory.

Key Words: anterior inferotemporal cortex • conceptual knowledge • functional semantic features • inferior parietal lobule • manipulative semantic features


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.