Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (849)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raichle, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raichle, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, S. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Cerebral Cortex 1994; 4:8-26
© Oxford University Press 1994


research-article

Practice-related Changes in Human Brain Functional Anatomy during Nonmotor Learning

Marcus E. Raichle1,2,4, Julie A. Fiez1,2, Tom O. Videen2, Ann-Mary K. MacLeod1, Jose V. Pardo3, Peter T. Fox1,2 and Steven E. Petersen1,2,4

1Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Departments Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, Missouri 63110, 2Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, Missouri 63110, 3Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, Missouri 63110., 4McDonnell Center for Studies of Higher Brain Function, Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, Missouri 63110.

Practice of a novel task leads to improved performance. The brain mechanisms associated with practice-induced improvement in performance are largely unknown. To address this question we have examined the functional anatomy of the human brain with positron emission tomography (PET) during the naive and practiced performance of a simple verbal response selection task (saying an appropriate verb for a visually presented noun). As a control state, subjects were asked to repeat the visually presented nouns. Areas of the brain most active during naive performance (anterior cingulata, left prefrontal and left posterior temporal cortices, and the right cerebellar hemisphere), compared to repeating the visually presented nouns, were all significantly less active during practiced performance. These changes were accompanied by changes in the opposite direction in sylvian-insular cortex bilaterally and left medial extras-triate cortex. In effect, brief practice made the cortical circuitry used for verbal response selection indistinguishable from simple word repetition. Introduction of a novel list of words reversed the learning-related effects. These results indicate that two distinct circuits can be used for verbal response selection and normal subjects can change the brain circuits used during task performance following less than 15 min of practice. One critical factor in determining the circuitry used appears to be the degree to which a task is learned or automatic.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.