Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 13, No. 8, 837-844,
August 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press
The Detection of Contingency and Animacy from Simple Animations in the Human Brain
1 Brain Activation and Mental Processes, INSERM U280, Lyon, France, , 2 College of Arts and Sciences, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63130, USA, , 3 Unite Mixte INSERM-UJF U594, LRC-CEA, Grenoble, France and , 4 Center for Mind, Brain and Learning, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
Contingencies between objects and people can be mechanical or intentional–social in nature. In this fMRI study we used simplified stimuli to investigate brain regions involved in the detection of mechanical and intentional contingencies. Using a factorial design we manipulated the ‘animacy’ and ‘contingency’ of stimulus movement, and the subject’s attention to the contingencies. The detection of mechanical contingency between shapes whose movement was inanimate engaged the middle temporal gyrus and right intraparietal sulcus. The detection of intentional contingency between shapes whose movement was animate activated superior parietal networks bilaterally. These activations were unaffected by attention to contingency. Additional regions, the right middle frontal gyrus and left superior temporal sulcus, became activated by the animate–contingent stimuli when subjects specifically attended to the contingent nature of the stimuli. Our results help to clarify neural networks previously associated with ‘theory of mind’ and agency detection. In particular, the results suggest that low-level perception of agency in terms of objects reacting to other objects at a distance is processed by parietal networks. In contrast, the activation of brain regions traditionally associated with theory of mind tasks appears to require attention to be directed towards agency and contingency.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. David, C. Aumann, N. S. Santos, B. H. Bewernick, S. B. Eickhoff, A. Newen, N. J. Shah, G. R. Fink, and K. Vogeley Differential involvement of the posterior temporal cortex in mentalizing but not perspective taking Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, September 1, 2008; 3(3): 279 - 289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. MCALEER and F. E. POLLICK Understanding intention from minimal displays of human activity Behav Res Methods, August 1, 2008; 40(3): 830 - 839. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Tavares, A. D. Lawrence, and P. J. Barnard Paying Attention to Social Meaning: An fMRI Study Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2008; 18(8): 1876 - 1885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Gerrans and V. E. Stone Generous or Parsimonious Cognitive Architecture? Cognitive Neuroscience and Theory of Mind Brit J Philos Sci, June 1, 2008; 59(2): 121 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Ogawa and T. Inui Lateralization of the Posterior Parietal Cortex for Internal Monitoring of Self- versus Externally Generated Movements. J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2007; 19(11): 1827 - 1835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. New, L. Cosmides, and J. Tooby Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise PNAS, October 16, 2007; 104(42): 16598 - 16603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. Mar, W. M. Kelley, T. F. Heatherton, and C. N. Macrae Detecting agency from the biological motion of veridical vs animated agents Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, September 1, 2007; 2(3): 199 - 205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. C. Thompson, M. Clarke, T. Stewart, and A. Puce Configural Processing of Biological Motion in Human Superior Temporal Sulcus J. Neurosci., September 28, 2005; 25(39): 9059 - 9066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. A. Pelphrey, J. P. Morris, and G. McCarthy Neural basis of eye gaze processing deficits in autism Brain, May 1, 2005; 128(5): 1038 - 1048. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Schultz, H. Imamizu, M. Kawato, and C. D. Frith Activation of the Human Superior Temporal Gyrus during Observation of Goal Attribution by Intentional Objects J. Cogn. Neurosci., December 1, 2004; 16(10): 1695 - 1705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. A. Pelphrey, J. P. Morris, and G. McCarthy Grasping the Intentions of Others: The Perceived Intentionality of an Action Influences Activity in the Superior Temporal Sulcus during Social Perception J. Cogn. Neurosci., December 1, 2004; 16(10): 1706 - 1716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|